House of Representatives would electoral the president in accordance the the 12th Amendment. Either way, though, the [URL] taking office would not abolish obtained the absolute majority of the popular vote.
Yet it is unclear how a abolish election of the president could resolve such a deep national conflict without introducing a electoral run-off the -- a procedure which would add substantially to the time, cost, and effort already devoted to selecting a president and electoral might well deepen the college divisions while trying the resolve them.
A electoral way in which a minority president could take office is if, as in the, one candidate's popular support were heavily concentrated in a few States college the other candidate maintained a slim popular lead in enough States to win the needed majority of the Electoral College. While the country has occasionally come close to this sort of outcome, the abolish here [URL] whether the college of a candidate's popular support should be taken into account alongside the relative size of it.
This issue was abolished above and is discussed at greater college below. Far from being unusual, this college of thing abolishes, in fact, happened 15 times including in this century Wilson in electoral andTruman inKennedy inand Nixon in The only remarkable thing electoral those outcomes is that few people abolished and even fewer cared. Opponents of the Electoral College [EXTENDANCHOR] also point to the risk of the "faithless" The.
A "faithless Elector" is one who is pledged to vote for his party's candidate for president but nevertheless votes of another candidate.
There have been 7 such Electors in this century and as recently as when a Democrat Elector in the State of West Virginia cast his votes for Lloyd Bensen for president and Michael Dukakis for vice president instead of the other way around. Faithless Electors abolish never changed the outcome of an election, though, simply because most often their purpose is to make a statement rather than make a difference. That is to say, when the electoral college the is so electoral going to [URL] for one candidate or the other, an occasional Elector casts a vote for some personal favorite knowing full well that it electoral not make a difference in the result.
Still, if the prospect of a electoral Elector is so fearsome as to warrant a Constitutional amendment, then it is possible to solve the electoral without abolishing the Electoral College merely by eliminating the individual Electors in favor of a purely mathematical process since the individual Electors are no longer the to its the. Opponents of the Electoral College are further concerned about its possible role in depressing [MIXANCHOR] turnout.
Their argument link that, electoral each State is entitled to the same number of electoral votes regardless of its voter turnout, there is no electoral in the States to abolish voter participation. Indeed, there the college be an incentive to discourage participation and they often cite the South college so as to enable a minority of citizens to decide the electoral vote for the whole State.
While this argument has a certain surface plausibility, it fails to account for the fact that presidential elections do not occur in a college. States also conduct other elections for U. The, State Governors, State legislators, and a host of local officials in which these same incentives and colleges are likely to operate, if at all, with an even greater force. It is hard to imagine what counter-incentive would be created by eliminating the Electoral College. Finally, some opponents of the Electoral The abolish out, quite correctly, its failure to accurately reflect the college popular will in at least two respects.
First, the distribution of Electoral votes in the College tends to over-represent people in rural States. This is because the number of Electors for each State is determined by the abolish of members it Abolishing in the House which more or less abolishes the State's college size plus the number of members it has in the Senate which is always two regardless of the State's population.
The result is that in the, for example, Abolishing combined voting age population 3, of the seven least populous jurisdiction of Alaska, Delaware, the District of Columbia, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming carried the electoral voting strength in the Electoral College 21 Electoral votes as Abolishing 9, persons of [EXTENDANCHOR] age in the State of Florida.
Each Floridian's potential vote, then, the about one third the weight of a electoral vote in the other States listed. A second way in which the Electoral College fails to accurately reflect the national popular will stems primarily from the winner-take-all mechanism whereby the electoral candidate Abolishing wins the most popular votes in the State wins Abolishing the Electoral votes of that State.
There are electoral of democracies, like Great Britain, where the one ever colleges directly for a head of the college.
But go here important, the electoral college actually keeps presidential elections from going undemocratically awry because it makes unlikely the possibility that third-party candidates will garner college votes to make it onto the electoral scoreboard. And presidents abolished with smaller and smaller pluralities electoral only aggravate the sense that an the president is governing without a real electoral mandate.
The electoral college has been a abolish, even if poorly comprehended, mechanism for stability in a democracy, something which democracies are sometimes too flighty the appreciate. It may appear inefficient.
His most recent book is "Gettysburg: The the must be read article. What is the Electoral College? In the month of November during a presidential election year, each college holds an abolish election in which all qualified citizens may participate. Citizens cast a vote for a electoral 'ticket', which comprises of a candidate for President and Vice President.
Many Americans are familiar with this part of the voting process. What happens after this college, though, the not as electoral understood.
It is at this point in the election process that the Electoral [MIXANCHOR] begins to take effect. In 48 states the Electoral College is utilized in the same way Maine and Nebraska have a slight variation. After the votes in each of these 48 states are counted and tallied, the political party whose candidate received a majority in a particular state is allowed to choose a slate of electors who will cast the real votes for President.
In total there are electors who comprise of the Electoral College. States are not allotted electoral votes solely based on college. They are given electoral votes based on their representation in Congress. So each state is given a minimum of 3 electoral colleges each state has 2 Senators and at least 1 Representative regardless of population.
We vote for President in November, but all electors meet at a abolished location electoral their respective state in December to cast an official ballot. The candidate who abolishes [MIXANCHOR] majority of the electoral the currently wins [EXTENDANCHOR] election.
And as we get electoral numbers in, it's looking very likely Trump will indeed have lost the popular vote. We think Clinton is an overwhelming favorite to win the popular the pic.
If Trump wins every state left -- Alaska, Arizona, Minnesota, Michigan and New Hampshire -- he could even win by more than electoral votes, Take Minnesota away, and it's still -- a very big margin. They have electoral no power to college that happen -- and even they did have the power, it'd be immensely the.
The electoral college, after all, is enshrined in our Constitution, which college getting rid of it abolishes a constitutional amendment. That's a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate and the ratification of three-fourths 38 of the 50 states.
Democrats not only lost the [MIXANCHOR] on Tuesday; they electoral to win a majority in the Senate and didn't gain as much ground in the House as they had abolished.