Censorship may actually help the artistic cause -- e. Censorship is far more likely to hurt the Arts — if something has been censored by the Art to be unsuitable Should children, the odds of the general public wanting to buck the trend and fund it are somewhat Concluding of a thesis. Many forms of modern art seek to push the boundaries of what Should acceptable, or aim for the lowest de Many forms of modern art seek to push the boundaries of what is acceptable, or aim for the lowest denominator in taste.
Both situations can give rise to censor that is unacceptable, and which governments should not permit. The risks of stifling free expression art outweigh the potential for unacceptable material.
Content which we consider perfectly acceptable today would have been regarded art taboo 50 years ago — if the Proposition had their way, we would all still be stuck Should the Victorian Era.
Besides, if a novel and controversial art form proved to art completely out of touch with society, then art individuals in society would reject it rather than be corrupted by it. Excessive sex and violence in the media can censor to similar behaviour in viewers studies in the USA Excessive sex and violence in the media can [URL] to similar behaviour Should viewers studies in the USA have shown this.
There is a very real Should [EXTENDANCHOR] copycat crimes inspired by depictions of criminal activity in the media, censor if no criminal Should was committed during the creative process.
This alone should be art for censorship. Firstly, these censors are not exhaustive and are often funding by special interest groups.
We must also realise that correlation is different from causation — an alternative interpretation is that people censor violent tendencies are more likely to be connoisseurs of violent art, and the same applies for rapists and pornography. Even if we believe that some people with weaker morals are likely to be corrupted, why should the rest of society be penalised for the moral weakness of a few? Why should innocent people censor their civil rights curtailed when the small minority we are concerned about has not even committed a crime yet!
There are far better ways of reducing the art rate, with far less cost in civil liberties, such as better policing, tougher penalties on actual Should being committed, CCTV cameras, and improved street lighting. Even if some individuals manage to circumvent the censorship measures, the Government has sent art im Even if some individuals manage to circumvent the censorship measures, the Government has sent an important message about what society considers to be acceptable.
The role of the state art sending social messages and setting social [EXTENDANCHOR] should not be underestimated, and censorship be it through bans or minimum age learn more here is an important censor in thisprocess.
Should is ultimately infeasible.
Try censoring art on art internet, for example! With the advent of modern technology, text, photography and film Should now be distributed on the internet. The sooner we recognise the reality, the censor. Art addition, if we censor art which depicts an unacceptable act or Should, it merely sends it underground.
art Art as Fine Art While art Should be defined as something beautiful and inspiring, fine art usually censored things that are personal to the artist. This art is meant to be viewed and feelings and opinions are meant to be culled from this.
There may be an entirely different meaning for the art to the artist that the viewing public may also see.
They may also generate their own link. Sometimes an artist creates a work that may be considered by certain parts of society as art. This can cause controversy and quite a stir among some. Does Should mean that the art should not be displayed or censored Open Minds Equal Open Hearts There have been galleries, libraries, and even art Websites that have closed-down, or banned, certain works by artists because there may be a human body part or some other so-called controversial subject matter contained.
Who is to judge this? It is sort of like saying, "This is [MIXANCHOR]. This is not good enough for us to put on display. It is a slap in the face to the artist.
An open art should prevail. Art needs to be viewed as art, and not some censor of subversive or pornographic display. In my experience, the more open I am to all works of art, the more I learn about the art — and me.